Slip & Fall Injuries

When a person slips and falls and is injured on another’s property, they may be entitled to compensation for those injuries. It is true that store owners, hotel managers, bar owners, amusement park staff – all have a legal duty to keep customers reasonably safe.
However, rarely are these cases as straightforward as they may seem, particularly given recent updates to Florida law that adversely affected the rights of slip-and-fall victims.
Our experienced premises liability attorneys at Freeman Injury Law understand that securing a fair settlement or verdict in these cases requires a legal team that is well-versed in property liability laws.
It’s a common mistake to assume that just because you fall on someone else’s property and are injured, you are entitled to collect damages. That would be considered “strict liability,” and Florida doesn’t impose that kind of responsibility on property owners and managers.
Slip-and-fall lawsuits are grouped under the umbrella of “premises liability law,” which deals with the kinds of duties and responsibilities owed by property owners, as well as the rights enjoyed by various types of visitors.
Florida’s New Slip-and-Fall Law
With regard to slip-and-fall cases occurring at a business establishment (where patrons are owed the highest degree of care as “business invitees”), F.S. 768.0755 was updated in 2010 to heighten the proof burden on injured parties.
Before, a plaintiff only needed to show a dangerous condition existed on the property and that it proximately caused plaintiff’s injuries. Now, proof of “actual or constructive knowledge” is required. That means plaintiff has to show not only did a dangerous condition exist, but also that store personnel knew or should have known about it and failed to take timely action to remedy the danger.
Most cases hinge on “constructive knowledge” or the “should have known” aspect. The law says that in order to prove constructive knowledge in a slip-and-fall lawsuit, plaintiff has to present circumstantial evidence showing:
- A dangerous condition for such a length of time that defendant should have discovered it in the course of exercising ordinary care;
- The condition occurred with such regularity that it was thus foreseeable.
From there, plaintiffs must also overcome defenses including the “open and obvious doctrine,” which holds people who can plainly see a danger in front of them (i.e., a slippery floor) have a duty to protect themselves by avoiding it. Additionally, injured people need to show injuries they sustained were proximately caused by the fall, and not some other incident or pre-existing condition.
Causes and Consequences of Slip-and-Falls
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates approximately 1 million people are treated in hospital emergency rooms annually as a result of slip-and-fall accidents.
Possible injuries resulting may include:
- Fractures and sprains of the wrist or arm
- Hip fractures
- Contusions, abrasions and lacerations of the skin
- Facial injuries
- Leg and foot fractures and sprains
- Concussion/head injury
The National Floor Safety Institute reports 55 percent of all slip-and-fall accidents are caused by hazardous walking surfaces. These include:
- Wet surfaces
- Recently mopped or waxed floors
- Rain or ice trudged in from outside
- Spills
- Uneven surfaces
These are often preventable conditions, or at least ones that property owners and managers can foresee and promptly address. For example, a store employee may not have created or known immediately about the spill in Aisle 3, caused by a shopper dropping his or her drink. However, the store should reasonably foresee such incidents might occur. If the store conducts routine maintenance and monitoring of the property, as it should in the course of exercising reasonable care, the spill should be discovered and promptly cleaned. If a fast clean-up isn’t possible, a “Wet Floor” sign should be posted to adequately warn passers-by of danger.
Slip-and-Falls on Non-Commercial Properties
There will be instances in which individuals will suffer a slip-and-fall injury on non-commercial property, either owned by the government or private individual. These tend to be handled a bit differently, depending on the circumstances.
The government owes a high degree of care to public invitees on public property. It must ensure the property is in reasonably safe condition for those who enter. However, lawsuits against the government require more extensive notice requirements and damages may be capped. It’s important to speak with an attorney to determine whether a lawsuit is worth pursuing.
With regard to landlords and private homeowners, they too owe it to guests to keep the property reasonably safe. However, these guests are deemed “licensees” rather than “invitees,” and this classification affords a lesser duty of care. In many cases, slip-and-fall injuries that occur on private property are covered under a homeowner’s insurance policy. In cases where injury costs exceed the insurance policy limit, homeowners and/or landlords may be found personally liable.
Contact Freeman Injury Law at (800) 561-7777 for a free consultation and review of your claim. You may also email attorney Dean Freeman at dfreeman@deanfreemanlaw.com.
Practice Areas
Get A Free Initial Consultation
4 Convenient Locations
West Palm Beach
5 Harvard Cir #110
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Plantation
8751 W Broward Blvd #106
Plantation, FL 33324
Miami
7685 SW 104th St #200
Miami, FL 33156
Orlando
258 Southhall Ln #140
Maitland, FL 32751
What Our Clients Say
ExcellentBased on 86 reviews
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
margarita Rodriguez (yvonne)2023-06-08I’m so great full and appreciate the help of this amazing firm. Freeman injury law were like an angel to me. My lawyer Brian Flanagan & Antonio Nieves were so understanding, calling me and giving me the right answers of my case. They did came through to me. I pray in Jesus Name to bless tremendously for the help that they provide. Thank you so much guys🙏♥️Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Martha Ann Lewis2023-04-11Great service! My attorney is Matthew Chiapperini and he is excellent. Attentive and thorough. He got me my full settlement and the process was incredibly smooth.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Beatriz Valencia2023-03-10Great customer service help me get as much as I could it was all worth it highly recommend they keep you updated all the time and if you have any questions or concerns they all always their to helpTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
SaaC Entertainment2023-03-08Definitely worth it if you want quality detail work. hopefully won’t have to need a lawyer again, but if I do I will certainly be coming back.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
MsBoo Mitch2023-03-07It was a long process but I am so grateful for Mr Bryan, Ms Nicole and Ms Morgan. They stayed on top of everything and kept me informed every step of the way. Thank you for everythingTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Robert Roldan2023-03-06I was fortunate to have Nicole Osberg involved in my case. She's not only caring and knowledgeable but she also gets things done. I highly recommend Freeman Injury Law.Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Ken Waller2023-03-03To whom this may concern freeman injury Law has the best legal team they care more about your health and they provide the best possible medical treatment Nicole and Morgan are the best they deserve to be a supervisor I’m healthy now thanks freeman injury lawTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Akeem Jones2023-03-02The best company to work with and Nicole is very very passionate about her job and clients and very helpful always!Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
latoya jones2023-01-19Always Excellent Service. They Always keep you informed on your case